Department of Justice Announces $42 Million Settlement for Alleged False Claims Act Violations

Posted on August 11, 2017 in Anti-Kickback Statute, Case Analysis, Settlement, Stark Act, Statutes and Regulations

0

Written by: Drew B. Howk

Recently, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced it had entered into a $42 million settlement (“Settlement”)[1] with the owners of a California acute care hospital (“Parent Company”) to resolve allegations that the Parent Company had violated the False Claims Act by submitting false claims to Medicare and MediCal (California Medicaid)... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , , , , ,

Seventh Circuit: Whistleblowers Cannot Build FCA Claims upon Public Information and Speculation

Posted on August 10, 2017 in Case Analysis, Public Disclosure Bar

0

Written by: Drew B. Howk

The public disclosure bar remains one of the most important tools for disposing of False Claims Act (“FCA”) claims. The Seventh Circuit’s recent decision in United States ex rel. Bellevue v. United Health Services of Hartgrove, Inc. clarified the effect of the 2010 amendments to the public disclosure bar and affirmed... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , ,

The False Claims Act and Indian Tribes: To What Extent Does Sovereign Immunity Protect Tribes and Their Business Activities?

Posted on May 19, 2017 in Case Analysis

0

Written by: Adele Merenstein

Executive Summary: Dahlstrom v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, No. C16-0053JLR, 2017 WL 1064399 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 21, 2017) On March 21, 2017, a federal judge agreed with the Sauk-Suiattle Indian tribe (the “Sauk-Suiattle” or the “Tribe”) that it could not be sued under the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) due to... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Third Circuit Issues Decision Explaining Pleading Standards and Materiality After Escobar

Posted on May 10, 2017 in False Certification, Materiality

0

Written by: Benjamin Waters

On May 1, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals released an important decision interpreting the False Claim Act’s (“FCA’s”) materiality requirement in light of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Universal Health Services Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar. The case, United States ex rel. Petratos v. Genentech, revolved... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , ,

Federal District Court Opines on Revised Stark Law Writing Requirement

Posted on March 28, 2017 in Case Analysis, Materiality, Regulatory Noncompliance, Stark Act, Statutes and Regulations

0

Written by: Allison Emhardt

On March 15, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania provided the first federal court interpretation of the writing requirements affecting several regulatory exceptions in the federal physician self-referral statute (“Stark Law”) and its implementing regulations since the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) provided... Continue Reading →

Fourth Circuit Says Attorney General Holds “Unreviewable Veto Power” Over Qui Tam Settlements and Sends Statistical Sampling Issue Back to the Trial Court

Posted on February 16, 2017 in Case Analysis, Damages, Discovery, Settlement

0

Written by: Jonathon Rabin

The Attorney General of the United States has an unreviewable veto power over qui tam settlements, according to the Fourth Circuit’s recent published decision in United States ex rel. Michaels v. Agape Senior Community.[1] In the same decision, the court declined to decide an issue raised by the relators over... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Courts Return to Real Particularity to Meet Rule 9(b)’s “Fraud with Particularity” Requirement

Posted on January 31, 2017 in Rule 9(b)

0

Written by: David B. Honig

The courts appear to be walking back their trend toward loosening False Claims Act (“FCA”) pleading requirements. The FCA is a fraud statute, and lawsuits alleging FCA violations must be pled under Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Fraud or Mistake; Conditions of Mind. In alleging fraud or mistake,... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Statistical Evidence and the False Claims Act

Posted on January 31, 2017 in Rule 9(b)

0

Written by: David B. Honig

The False Claims Act[1] is a fraud statute; therefore, False Claims Act complaints must be pled with particularity,[2] identifying “the who, what, when, where, and how of an actual false claim” submitted to the government.[3] Whistleblowers without evidence of specific claims have tried to circumvent the rule with statistics, showing... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , , , ,

Trial Court Pushes Back on “Fraud with Particularity” Requirement

Posted on January 25, 2017 in Rule 9(b)

0

Written by: David B. Honig

The Federal District Court for the Middle District of Florida appears  to have rejected recent direction from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal to deny a motion to dismiss in a False Claims Act case. In United States ex rel. Napoli et al. v. Premier Hospitalists PL, et al. the... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

OIG Final Rule Significantly Expands Exclusion Authority

Posted on January 19, 2017 in Exclusion

0

Written by: Patrick Garcia

On January 12, 2017, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) published the “Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; Revisions to the Office of Inspector General’s Exclusion Authorities” Final Rule (“Final Rule”) revising and expanding its authority to exclude individuals and entities from participation in... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,