U.S. ex rel. Fowler v. Caremark RX, L.L.C.
Posted on June 21, 2012 in Case Cites
0
Written by: David B. Honig
496 F.3d 730, (7th Cir. 2007), cert. denied 552 U.S. 1183, 128 S.Ct. 1246, 170 L.Ed.2d 66, 76 USLW 3316, 76 USLW 3437, 76 USLW 3439 (U.S. Feb 19, 2008), overruled on other grounds, Glaser v. Wound Care Consultants, Inc., 570 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir. 2009).
The Court rules that to satisfy the requirements of Rule 9(b) a False Claims Act whistleblower, while not required to provide detailed information as to every single allegedly false claim, must, at a minimum, identify at least one actual claim that is false. It described the requirement as one of specificity “at an individualized transaction level.” At 741-742
For more information, please contact David B. Honig at dhonig@hallrender.com or (317) 977-1447.
RSS Subscribe
Government Enforcement/FCA Task Force
Representative FCA Cases
Categories
attorney's fees
Biographies
Case Analysis
Case Cites
Conditions of Participation
Counterclaims
Criminal Fraud
Damages
Discovery
E&M Coding
Employment
Exclusion
False Certification
FCA
Fees
First to File
Government Intervention
Legal Updates
Litigation Handbook
Materiality
MSPA
Original Source
Pharmacy
Privilege
Public Disclosure Bar
Qui Tam
Regulatory Noncompliance
Release
Retained Overpayments
Reverse False Claims
Rule 12(b)(6)
Rule 9(b)
Safe Harbor
Seal
Settlement
Stark Act
Statute of Limitations
Statutes and Regulations
Uncategorized
Worthless Services