The D.C. Circuit Draws the Line at “Potential” Penalties Being Considered Obligations Under the False Claims Act

Posted on January 22, 2018 in Case Analysis, Rule 12(b)(6), Rule 9(b)

0
In United States ex rel. Schneider v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat’l Ass’n. [1], the D.C. Circuit re-affirms its position that contingent penalties are not obligations under the False Claims Act (“FCA”). BACKGROUND In the initial suit[2], Relator brought a qui tam action under the FCA against mortgage loan servicer JPMorgan... Continue Reading →

Tags: , , , ,