• Firm History
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Presentations
  • Hall Render Website
  • Contact

Ackerman v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Posted on June 21, 2012 in Case Cites

0
172 F.3d 467, cert. denied 528 U.S. 874, 120 S.Ct. 178, 145 L.Ed.2d 151, 68 USLW 3080, 68 USLW 3196, 68 USLW 3228 (U.S. Oct 04, 1999). The purpose of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 9(b), which requires that fraud be plead “with particularity,” is not, as some say, to give... Continue Reading →

Tags: Fed.R.Civ.P., Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, fraud, fraud with particularity, Rule 9(b)


RSS Subscribe

Government Enforcement/FCA Task Force

    Chair
  • David Honig
  • Members
  • Timothy B. Adelman
  • Bruce Bagdady
  • Laetitia L. Cheltenham
  • Ritu Kaur Cooper
  • Timothy W. Feeley
  • David A. French
  • J. Patrick Garcia
  • Andrew B. Howk
  • Katherine A. Kuchan
  • Jonathan A. Rabin
  • N. Kent Smith
  • Bradley M. Taormina

Representative FCA Cases

  • Representative Case List

Categories

Anti-Kickback Statute
attorney's fees
Biographies
blogs
Case Analysis
Case Cites
Conditions of Participation
Counterclaims
Criminal Fraud
Damages
Discovery
E&M Coding
Employment
Exclusion
False Certification
FCA
Fees
First to File
Government Intervention
Legal Updates
Litigation Handbook
Materiality
MSPA
news
Original Source
Pharmacy
Privilege
Public Disclosure Bar
Qui Tam
Regulatory Noncompliance
Release
Retained Overpayments
Reverse False Claims
Rule 12(b)(6)
Rule 9(b)
Safe Harbor
Seal
Settlement
Stark Act
Statute of Limitations
Statutes and Regulations
Uncategorized
Worthless Services

Blog Roll

  • Federal Advocacy
  • Health Information Technology
  • HR Insights for Health Care
  • Litigation Analysis
  • Long-Term Care, Home Health & Hospice
  • False Claims Act Defense
  • Hall Render Blog
© 2002-2025. Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.
THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT
DISCLAIMER
© 2002-2025. Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.
THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT
DISCLAIMER