<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FALSE CLAIMS ACT DEFENSE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fcadefense.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fcadefense.com</link>
	<description>fighting the whistleblower and the government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>False Claims Act Update, May 2013</title>
		<link>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/false-claims-act-update-may-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/false-claims-act-update-may-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David B. Honig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fresenius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keltner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakeshore Medical Clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qui tam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toumey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ulysses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fcadefense.com/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three new FCA cases of interest were reported in the last few weeks. One was discussed previously on FCADefense.com in Toumey Loses Stark/FCA Case Again by Drew Howk. Another, Ulysses, Inc. v. United States[1] is yet another example of the growing trend of failed FCA counter-claims by the Government in response to contract litigation. The Third, Fresenius Medical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/false-claims-act-update-may-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toumey Loses Stark/FCA Case Again</title>
		<link>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/toumey-loses-starkfca-case-again/</link>
		<comments>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/toumey-loses-starkfca-case-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 15:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David B. Honig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toumey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verdict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fcadefense.com/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jury verdicts in False Claims Act litigation are rare. Two in the same case are rarer still. On May 8, 2013, after just over four hours of deliberation, a jury in the Federal District Court of South Carolina returned a verdict for the Government, finding that the Tuomey Healthcare System violated both the Stark law [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/toumey-loses-starkfca-case-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retained Overpayments Change the FCA Ball Game</title>
		<link>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/retained-overpayments-change-the-fca-ball-game/</link>
		<comments>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/retained-overpayments-change-the-fca-ball-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 12:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David B. Honig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keltner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakeshore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overpayment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qui tam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fcadefense.com/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[False Claims Act defense attorneys have been warning government contractors, particularly Medicare and Medicaid providers, of increased risks and a reduced ability to defend against whistleblower complaints since the passage of the Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act of 2009 (&#8220;FERA&#8221;). The greatest risk comes from FERA&#8217;s addition of a new kind of reverse false claim: the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fcadefense.com/false_claims_act/whistleblower/qui_tam/retained-overpayments-change-the-fca-ball-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
